Mental Perception and Cognition: A Frame-Semantics Perspective
Most studies on cognition reveal its connection to human cognitive capabilities such as perception, emotion, and movement. In this talk, however, the term cognition refers to a conceptual domain that denotes any type of state, activity or process of the human mind of a purely conceptual character.
Based on the theory of Frame Semantics, I propose an outline of the cognition domain, which takes the project FrameNet as point of departure, but entrenches with cognitive science claims on their understanding of cognition. That is, I propose a re-structuring of the domain using not only the information provided by dictionaries, and corpora, which reflect how language users think cognition works, but taking into account cognitive scientists’ perspective of cognition. These non-exclusive perspectives (e.g. folk model vs. expert model) can only enrich the layout of the domain. Subsequently, the final layout of the domain shows the creation of new frames, inclusion of new frame elements as well as the modification of some frame definitions according to cognitive science references. In addition to this, the domain is characterised by what I have called ‘cognitive-semantic attributes’, which run parallel to the most basic ‘semantic types’ described in the FrameNet project.
Finally, there is a proposal of the frame to frame relations within this domain. An illustration of these relations will be presented for the frames: Mental_perception (perceptual act), Coming_to_Believe (change of state of knowledge) and Awareness (state of knowledge).
ACHARD, M. (1996): “Two causation/perception construction in French” in Cognitive Linguistics 7-4, 315-357.
FILLMORE, C. J. “The FrameNet Project” [http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~FrameNet]
FILLMORE, C. J. (1982): Frame Semantics. In Linguistics Society of Korea, ed., Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, 59-81. New York: Academic Press.
GOLDBERG, A. (1995): Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
GOLDBERG, A. (1998a): “Patterns of Experience in Patterns of Language” in The New Psychology of Language, Cognition and Functional Approach to Language Structure by Tomasello, M. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. New York/London. Pp. 203-219
LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The
SÁNCHEZ GARCÍA, J. Mª. (1999): “Lexical Structure, Lexical Concepts and Metaphorical Concepts: The Case of “Change” Verbs in English” in Journal of English Studies, I (1999). 257-269.
TALMY, L. (1988): “Force dynamics in language and cognition”, Cognitive Science 12: 49-100. Also in Papers from the Twenty-first Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Dep of Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago. IL. (1985)